Scroll or click a layer to cut into it · click a node to pull its thread
The three doṣas, seven dhātus, agni and the malas, lit on the shared cross-section — the body as substance, threaded to the elements and to the breath.
This lens lights 40 points on the shared cross-section rather than replacing it. Every record below names its source, and carries one of three tags: classical where a named text can be cited, later addition where an idea is modern and is said to be modern, and sources differ where the tradition itself disagrees.
The digestive and metabolic fire — the faculty that turns what is taken in into what the body is made of.
Classically thirteen agnis: one jāṭhara at the centre, five bhūtāgnis for the elements, seven dhātvagnis for the tissues. The central one governs the rest.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā, Cikitsāsthāna 15; Aṣṭāṅga Hṛdaya, Sūtrasthāna 12
Asthi is bone — the tissue of structure, and the one that outlasts all the others. Āyurveda reads it for the body's frame and its capacity to bear weight, and names it the seat where vāta accumulates most readily.
Asthi is the fifth dhātu, formed from medas and giving rise to majjā. Its upadhātu are the teeth; its waste products are hair and nails. Its relationship to vāta is described as viruddha āśraya āśrayī — an unusual case in which a doṣa resides in a tissue whose qualities oppose its own, so that vāta's increase depletes bone rather than accumulating in it.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā; Aṣṭāṅga Hṛdaya (āśraya āśrayī); BPHS 3.31
Bheda is the sixth and last stage — the condition becoming settled and structurally distinct, having acquired a character of its own. The word means splitting or breaking, and the framework uses it for the point at which what has developed no longer resembles the disturbance that began it.
The classical descriptions concern chronicity and structural change, and the literature is candid that the sixth stage is where the framework's own recommendations become least effective. The whole architecture of six stages exists to argue for attention at the first two rather than the last.
Source: Suśruta Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna (bheda)
The bhūtāgnis are five fires, one for each element, held to act on food after the central fire has done its work. Their office is to make what has been eaten resemble what the body already is — earth in the food becoming earth in the eater.
There are five, corresponding to ether, air, fire, water and earth. The classical account places their action in the liver and in the tissues, after jāṭharāgni and before the tissue-fires. The reasoning is that food is composed of the same five elements as the body, and each element in the food must be processed by its own like before it can be assimilated.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā, Cikitsāsthāna 15; Sāṃkhya Kārikā (mahābhūta); Vedānta (panchīkaraṇa)
Each of the seven tissues is held to carry its own fire, which converts what arrives into that tissue specifically. Rasa's fire makes plasma; asthi's makes bone. The scheme puts the work of becoming a particular thing inside the thing itself.
Seven dhātvāgnis complete the count of thirteen. Each acts on the nutrient portion delivered from the tissue before it, producing three outputs: the tissue proper, an upadhātu or secondary product, and a waste. The sequence runs rasa to rakta to māṃsa to medas to asthi to majjā to śukra, and a weakness at any point is described as showing in everything after it.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā, Cikitsāsthāna 15; Suśruta Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna 14 (poṣaṇa nyāya)
Sammūrchana is the compounding of a disturbed doṣa with the tissue it has settled in, producing something that is neither — the point at which a general disturbance acquires a particular character.
It occurs at the fourth stage of the cascade, once a doṣa has lodged at a site of weakness. The classical account holds that the resulting condition takes its features from both parties, which is why the same doṣa is described as producing different results in different tissues.
Source: Suśruta Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna (sammūrchana)
The simultaneous model holds that all seven tissues are nourished at once, in a single moment, without sequence or delay. It is the most radical of the three and the least often reported.
On this account the apparent order of the tissues is a description of their refinement rather than of a process taking place over time. The model is sometimes described through the image of a lamp lighting a room, where illumination reaches every corner at once rather than travelling.
Source: Commentarial literature on dhātu poṣaṇa nyāya
Jāṭharāgni is the fire of the belly — the central digestive capacity, and in Āyurveda's account the one on which all the others depend. The tradition places it first not because digestion is the most important function but because everything downstream is made from what it produces.
It is the first of thirteen agnis in the classical count: one jāṭhara, five bhūtāgnis and seven dhātvāgnis. Its work is to convert food into āhāra rasa, the nutrient essence from which the first tissue is formed. Its seat is the stomach and small intestine, the same region the texts assign to pitta, and its state is read through appetite, timing and the quality of what follows a meal.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā, Cikitsāsthāna 15 (thirteen agnis); Aṣṭāṅga Hṛdaya; Haṭhayogapradīpikā (navel fire)
Kapha is cohesion — the principle that holds structure together, lubricates, and provides reserve. Āyurveda reads it for stability, immunity, patience and bulk, and regards its excess and its deficit as equally consequential.
Kapha is water and earth, and its qualities are heavy, slow, cool, oily, smooth, dense and stable. Its principal seat is the stomach, with secondary sites in the chest, throat, head, joints and plasma. It predominates in childhood, as vāta does in age and pitta in the middle years — a life-stage sequence the classical texts state directly.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā; Aṣṭāṅga Hṛdaya; comparative: Sāṃkhya Kārikā, Trika tattva scheme
The field-and-canal analogy holds that nutrient flows in sequence, like water led through channels from one paddy field to the next, each field taking its share as the stream passes and passing the rest along.
On this account the seven tissues are nourished strictly in order, and the timing follows directly: the classical figure of roughly a month for food to reach śukra is a consequence of the serial model rather than an independent observation. A weakness anywhere in the chain starves everything downstream of it.
Source: Suśruta Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna 14
The threshing-floor analogy holds that each tissue draws what it needs directly from circulating nutrient, as pigeons fly from a common threshing floor to their own nests — each taking its share according to its own capacity, none waiting on another.
On this account nourishment is parallel rather than serial, and the agent of selection is the tissue's own fire rather than its position in a queue. The model explains why a tissue can be well nourished while another is not, without requiring a blockage between them.
Source: Suśruta Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna 14; commentarial harmonisations
Khavaiguṇya is a weakness in a channel — a pre-existing defect at some site that determines where a spreading doṣa comes to rest. In the framework's logic it is what makes lodgement specific rather than random.
The word combines kha, an opening or space, with vaiguṇya, defect. Causes given in the classical literature include injury, prior disturbance, suppression of natural urges, and inherited constitution. It is the constraint that stops the spread model from being able to place a doṣa anywhere at all.
Source: Suśruta Saṃhitā (khavaiguṇya); commentarial discussion of causation
The milk-and-curd analogy holds that one tissue becomes the next by transformation rather than by transfer — as milk becomes curd entire, with nothing left over and nothing carried across.
On this account rasa does not hand something to rakta; rasa becomes rakta, wholly, in the way a substance changes state. The analogy is used to explain why the tissues appear in a fixed order and why a deficiency at one point is described as showing in everything after it.
Source: Suśruta Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna 14; commentarial literature on dhātu poṣaṇa
Majjā is marrow and, in the classical usage, nerve tissue as well — the innermost substance, held inside bone. Āyurveda reads it for the filling of the body's hollows, for unction, and for the strength that is not visible from outside.
Majjā is the sixth dhātu, formed from asthi and giving rise to śukra. Its waste products are the oily secretions of the eyes and skin. Its seat is the interior of the long bones and, in some descriptions, the cranial cavity. Its depletion is described as producing thin bones, dizziness and a sense of emptiness in the joints.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā; BPHS 3.31 (majjā → Mars)
Manda agni is the fire described as dull — slow, weak, processing less than it is given. It is associated with kapha, whose qualities are heaviness and slowness, and it is the state the classical literature discusses at greatest length.
Its description is of food that sits, appetite that does not arrive, and a sense of heaviness that outlasts the meal. It is the state most closely connected to āma, the half-processed residue the texts hold to be the beginning of the disease cascade — which is why it receives more attention than the other three combined.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā (agni states, āma); 'toxins' rendering: modern
Medas is fat — the tissue of lubrication, insulation and stored reserve. Āyurveda regards it as neither surplus nor failing but as the body's buffer, and reads both its excess and its depletion as consequential.
Medas is the fourth dhātu, formed from māṃsa and giving rise to asthi. Its upadhātu are the tendons; its waste is sweat. Its seat is the abdomen and the subcutaneous layer. Its excess is described as producing heaviness, breathlessness and sluggishness of the joints; its deficit as cracking joints, dry eyes and a persistent desire for fatty food.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā; BPHS 3.31 (vasā/medas → Jupiter)
Māṃsa is muscle and flesh — the tissue of strength, bulk and the covering that protects what is underneath. Āyurveda reads it for physical capacity and for a kind of settledness: adequate māṃsa is described as producing confidence rather than merely power.
Māṃsa is the third dhātu, formed from rakta and giving rise to medas. Its upadhātu are the skin's layers and the subcutaneous fat; its waste products are the secretions of the ears, eyes and nose. It is governed by māṃsa agni, one of the seven tissue-fires, and its excess and deficit are described in the texts with equal specificity.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā, Cikitsāsthāna 15; BPHS 3.31 (snāyu)
Mūtra is the liquid waste, and in Āyurveda's account the principal means by which the body regulates how much fluid it holds. It is the second of the three malas.
Its formation is attributed to the separation of liquid from solid in the colon, and it is read for the state of the water element and of pitta's heat. The classical descriptions concern colour, quantity and frequency, which the texts treat as reporting on the system rather than on the kidney.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā (mūtra); mūtra parīkṣā / taila bindu: medieval development
The final refined essence of the seven tissues — the substrate of immunity, steadiness and vigour.
Held to be the end-product of the dhātu sequence, distilled from śukra, and measurable only by its effects: resilience, clarity, evenness of temper.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna 17; Suśruta Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna 15
Ojas, tejas and prāṇa are described as the subtle counterparts of the three doṣas — ojas of kapha, tejas of pitta, prāṇa of vāta. Where the doṣas are what can go wrong, these are described as what holds a person together.
Ojas is the final refinement of śukra, the seventh tissue, and is treated in the classical literature as the basis of stability and resistance. Tejas is the subtle aspect of fire, and prāṇa of movement. The classical texts discuss ojas at length; the triad as a set is more prominent in later and modern presentations.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā (ojas); the ojas-tejas-prāṇa triad as a set: largely modern systematisation
Pitta is transformation — digestion in the widest sense, covering food, perception and understanding alike. Āyurveda reads it for heat, sharpness, appetite and the capacity to break something down into what can be used.
Pitta is fire with a small water component, and its qualities are hot, sharp, light, oily, liquid and spreading. Its principal seat is the small intestine, with secondary sites in the stomach, blood, sweat, eyes and skin. It is closely bound to agni, the digestive fire, though the two are not identical: agni is the function, pitta the substance that houses it.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā; Suśruta Saṃhitā (rakta); Aṣṭāṅga Hṛdaya, Sūtrasthāna 1
Prakopa is the second stage — the accumulated doṣa becoming agitated in its own seat, still without having gone anywhere. The tradition describes it as pressure rather than as an event.
The doṣa's qualities intensify where it has gathered, and the classical descriptions are of local sensations in the seat itself. The framework's practical claim is that the first two stages are where the cascade is most readily interrupted, because nothing has yet moved out of its own territory.
Source: Suśruta Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna (ṣaṭkriyākāla)
Prakṛti is the constitution a person is held to be born with — a fixed proportion of the three doṣas established at conception. Vikṛti is the current departure from it. The distinction is between what someone is and what is presently the case.
The classical account fixes prakṛti at conception and holds it unchanged for life, while vikṛti varies with season, age, food and circumstance. Assessment compares the two, and the framework's aim is described as returning vikṛti toward prakṛti rather than toward any external standard.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā, Vimānasthāna (prakṛti); Sāṃkhya Kārikā (prakṛti as avyakta)
Prasāra is the third stage — the doṣa leaving its own seat and moving through the body. In the framework's logic this is the threshold: before it, a disturbance is local; after it, the location where something appears need not be the location where it began.
The classical account has the doṣa carried by the channels and by vāta's motive quality, which is why vāta is described as the vehicle for the other two even when it is not itself the disturbance. Where it comes to rest is held to depend on a weakness in the destination rather than on the doṣa's own direction.
Source: Suśruta Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna; khavaiguṇya as constraint
The subtle essence of vitality — the life-force considered as a bodily substance rather than as a wind.
Paired with vāta among the doṣas and with prāṇa-vāyu among the five winds, without being identical to either.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā; Aṣṭāṅga Hṛdaya; comparative: prāṇa-vāyu in the yogic corpus
Purīṣa is the solid waste — what remains after the central fire has taken what it can. Āyurveda counts it among the three malas, and is explicit that a waste is not merely a leftover.
The classical account gives purīṣa a function as well as an origin: it holds and supports in the colon, which is vāta's principal seat, so its quantity and consistency are read as a report on vāta's state. Its formation is attributed to the residue of jāṭharāgni's work.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā (malas and their functions)
Rakta is blood — the tissue of heat, colour and vitality, formed from rasa by the action of fire. Āyurveda reads it for complexion, warmth and the capacity to sustain effort, and reads its disturbance as showing first in the skin and the eyes.
Rakta is the second dhātu, made from rasa and giving rise to māṃsa. Its upadhātu are the tendons and blood vessels; its waste is bile. Its seat is the liver and spleen. It is the tissue most closely bound to pitta, and its vitiation is the basis of the whole raktapitta category of disorders in the classical nosology.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā; Suśruta Saṃhitā (rakta); Aṣṭāṅga Hṛdaya Sū. 1; BPHS 3.31
Rasa is the first tissue — plasma and lymph, the watery sap drawn straight out of digested food. Everything else in the body is made from it in sequence, so Āyurveda reads its quality as setting a ceiling on the quality of all six tissues downstream.
Rasa is formed from āhāra rasa, the nutrient essence produced by jāṭhara agni, and it is the substrate from which rakta is made. Its upadhātu are breast milk and menstrual fluid; its waste product is kapha. Its qualities are read for satisfaction, moisture and contentment, and its depletion is described in the classical texts as dryness, fatigue and intolerance of noise.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā, Cikitsāsthāna; Suśruta Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna 14 (dhātu poṣaṇa nyāya)
Sama agni is the fire described as even — neither sharp nor dull, working at a steady rate. It is the reference state against which the other three are defined, rather than a fourth condition alongside them.
The classical descriptions are behavioural rather than measurable: appetite arriving at regular intervals, food processed without discomfort, and the cycle repeating without variation. Sama is associated with the three doṣas in balance, which is why it is the baseline rather than an achievement.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā (agni states); cf. mānasa doṣas
Sañcaya is the first stage — a doṣa quietly gathering in its own seat, without having done anything yet. The framework's central claim is that this is where a disturbance begins, long before there is anything to notice.
The doṣa increases where it already lives: vāta in the colon, pitta in the small intestine, kapha in the stomach. The classical description is of a mild aversion to whatever has the same qualities as the accumulating doṣa — a body declining more of what it already has too much of.
Source: Suśruta Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna (ṣaṭkriyākāla); Caraka Saṃhitā (different organisation)
Sthāna saṃśraya is the fourth stage — the spreading doṣa settling somewhere, at a place already weakened. The framework holds that a disturbance does not lodge at random; it lodges where something has already given way.
The weakness is called khavaiguṇya, a defect in a channel, and the interaction between the settled doṣa and the tissue it settles in is doṣa-dūṣya sammūrchana — a compounding of the two into something that is neither. The classical account holds this as the moment a general disturbance becomes a particular one.
Source: Suśruta Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna; khavaiguṇya, doṣa-dūṣya sammūrchana
Sveda is sweat — the third mala, and the one the tradition connects most directly to a tissue rather than to digestion. It is described as the waste product of medas, the fat tissue.
Its stated function is to maintain the skin and to regulate temperature, and its state is read for medas and for pitta. Unlike the other two malas it is not produced by the central fire but by a tissue fire, which places it at a different point in the chain.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā (malas, dhātu-malas)
The principle of similarity and difference holds that like increases like and unlike decreases it. It is the single rule from which most of Āyurveda's practical reasoning follows, and it is stated as a first principle rather than derived.
Sāmānya is similarity, viśeṣa difference, and the rule applies to qualities rather than to substances: what is heavy increases heaviness wherever it is found, and what is light decreases it. Caraka places this at the opening of the Sūtrasthāna, which marks it as foundational to everything that follows.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna 1; Vaiśeṣika Sūtra (sāmānya, viśeṣa as padārthas)
The subtle counterpart of fire in the body — lustre, sharpness of perception, the refining edge of metabolism.
One of the three subtle essences alongside ojas and prāṇa, standing to pitta as ojas stands to kapha and prāṇa to vāta.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā; Aṣṭāṅga Hṛdaya; comparative: Sāṃkhya tejas as element
Tīkṣṇa agni is the fire described as sharp — quick, hot and consuming more than it is given. It is associated with pitta, and the tradition is careful that this is not read as a strength.
Its classical description is a fire that processes food faster than it arrives, producing hunger that returns quickly and does not wait. The texts group it with the other deviations rather than with sama, on the principle that excess and deficit are equally departures from the even state.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā (agni states)
Viṣama agni is the fire described as irregular — sometimes strong, sometimes absent, without a settled rhythm. The tradition associates it with vāta, the principle of movement, on the reasoning that what moves erratically produces erratic effects.
Its classical description is variability itself: appetite that arrives at unpredictable times, digestion that proceeds unevenly, and outcomes that differ from one meal to the next without an obvious cause. It is read as vāta's quality of mobility expressed in the digestive region rather than as a separate disorder.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā (agni states); modern diagnostic pairings: post-classical
Vyakti is the fifth stage — the point at which something becomes apparent, and can be named. In the framework's account this is late, not early: five-sixths of the process has already happened by the time there is anything to observe.
This is where the classical nosology assigns a name to what has developed, and where the earlier stages become retrospectively legible. The texts are explicit that the naming happens here and not before, which is why the framework's own emphasis falls so heavily on what precedes it.
Source: Suśruta Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna (vyakti)
Vāta is movement — everything in the body that travels, from breath and nerve impulse to the passage of food and the turning of a thought. Āyurveda regards it as the doṣa that carries the other two, which is why disturbance here tends to show up everywhere.
Vāta is composed of air and ether, and its qualities are dry, light, cold, rough, subtle and mobile. Its principal seat is the colon, with secondary sites in the pelvis, bones, skin, ears and thighs. It is divided into five vāyus — prāṇa, udāna, samāna, apāna and vyāna — each governing a direction of movement, and it is the doṣa that increases naturally with age.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna; Aṣṭāṅga Hṛdaya, Sūtrasthāna 1; comparative: Amṛtasiddhi
The principle of shelter holds that each doṣa resides in particular tissues, and that what happens to the resident and the residence is normally shared — increase one and the other tends to follow.
Kapha resides in rasa and the fluid tissues, pitta in rakta and sweat, vāta in asthi. The rule is that a doṣa and its seat rise and fall together, which is used to explain why a disturbance in one shows in the other. The rule is invoked to explain why a disturbance in a doṣa is looked for in its seat, and why the seat is examined when the doṣa is suspected.
Source: Aṣṭāṅga Hṛdaya (āśraya-āśrayī, vāta-asthi as viruddha)
Śukra is the seventh and final tissue, the most refined product of the chain — reproductive essence, and in the classical reading the substrate of vitality, lustre and the capacity for joy. It takes about a month to form from food, which the texts state as a matter of course.
Śukra is formed from majjā and has no dhātu beyond it; its refinement instead yields ojas, the subtle essence the texts treat as the basis of immunity and stability. It is present throughout the body rather than localised, and its depletion is described as producing weakness, dryness and a diminished capacity for pleasure — which Āyurveda regards as a health matter rather than a luxury.
Source: Caraka Saṃhitā (śukra, ojas); BPHS 3.31; Amṛtasiddhi (bindu)
The map · The 42 · What this is · Sources · Your chart