Scroll or click a layer to cut into it · click a node to pull its thread
The thirty-six tattvas as a spine: from the unmanifest down through the veil to the five elements, drawn on one cross-section with every other Indian system attached.
This lens lights 30 points on the shared cross-section rather than replacing it. Every record below names its source, and carries one of three tags: classical where a named text can be cited, later addition where an idea is modern and is said to be modern, and sources differ where the tradition itself disagrees.
Prakṛti is nature — not the visible world but its source, holding the three guṇas in perfect equilibrium before anything has emerged. In this state she is called avyakta, the unmanifest, and everything on the outward side of this map is her, unfolded.
Prakṛti is uncaused and unproduced; everything else in the scheme except puruṣa is her evolute. Manifestation begins when the equilibrium of sattva, rajas and tamas is disturbed by proximity to puruṣa, and proceeds by a fixed sequence — mahat, then ahaṃkāra, then the eleven faculties and five tanmātras, then the five elements. She is unconscious throughout; nothing in the sequence is chosen.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā (prakṛti as avyakta, dualism); Advaita and Trika (non-dual closure)
Rajas is the guṇa of movement and drive — the strand by which anything happens rather than merely being. It is restlessness and also energy; the tradition does not treat those as separable, and does not present the second without the first.
Rajas is what disturbs the equilibrium in which prakṛti rests, so it is the condition of manifestation itself: without it there is no unfolding. In Sāṃkhya it supplies the motive force for both of ahaṃkāra's other products, the faculties and the subtle essences, without producing an evolute of its own. In Āyurveda it is one of the two mental doṣas, associated with agitation and desire.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā; Bhagavad Gītā Ch. 14, 17–18; Caraka Saṃhitā
Tattva three. The first appearance of a “this” — faint, and swamped by the “I” that holds it.
The formula given is ahaṃ idam with the ahaṃ dominant. Will (icchā) predominates here.
Source: Tantrāloka; Mālinīvijayottara; Sadāśiva as the icchā-dominant tattva
Sattva is the guṇa of clarity, lightness and illumination — the quality by which anything is knowable at all. It is not goodness in a moral sense so much as transparency: the condition in which something can be seen for what it is.
Sattva is one of prakṛti's three constituent strands, present in everything in some proportion, with the proportion determining what a thing is. The guṇas are described as substances rather than properties — they do not qualify a thing, they compose it — which is why a shift in proportion is a change in kind, not merely in mood. Buddhi's capacity to discriminate is attributed to sattva's dominance in it.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā (three guṇas); Caraka Saṃhitā (rajas and tamas as mānasa doṣas)
Tamas is the guṇa of weight, obstruction and concealment — the strand by which anything holds its shape, resists, or stays hidden. It is not simply a defect: without it nothing would persist long enough to be anything.
Tamas dominates in the gross elements, which is why matter is stable and opaque, and it is the guṇa under which ahaṃkāra produces the tanmātras and through them the mahābhūtas. Its concealing quality is what makes discrimination difficult, so in the soteriological reading it is what has to be thinned rather than destroyed.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā; Bhagavad Gītā Ch. 14; Trika (contraction as divine act)
Tattva four. Idam ahaṃ — the “this” now clear, the “I” holding it. Knowledge (jñāna) predominates.
The object has definition. There is still no separation: the knower has not been placed outside what it knows.
Source: Tantrāloka; Mālinīvijayottara; Īśvara as the jñāna-dominant tattva
The second tattva. Vimarśa — awareness aware of itself. Not a second entity beside the light but the light’s own reflexivity.
Utpaladeva’s argument is that a light which did not know itself would be indistinguishable from no light at all; self-awareness is therefore not an addition to consciousness but its definition. Śakti is that self-relation, given a name.
Source: Tantrāloka; Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikā of Utpaladeva; Yoginīhṛdaya 1.56–57 on vimarśa
The first tattva. Pure consciousness as prakāśa — light, in the sense of that by which anything is manifest at all.
Śaiva Trika counts thirty-six tattvas where Sāṃkhya counts twenty-five. The extra eleven sit above prakṛti, and Śiva is the top of them. The claim is not that Sāṃkhya is wrong but that it starts too far down: it begins with a puruṣa already separate from a prakṛti, and does not ask where that separation came from.
Source: Tantrāloka; Pratyabhijñāhṛdaya of Kṣemarāja; Mālinīvijayottara Tantra
Tattva five. “I am this and this is I” — the two in equilibrium, distinct and known to be one. Action (kriyā) predominates.
This is the last of the śuddha, pure, tattvas. Above it nothing has been cut; below it everything has.
Source: Tantrāloka; Mālinīvijayottara; Śuddhavidyā as the kriyā-dominant tattva
The first cloak. Kalā limits agency: from can-do-anything to can-do-something.
The kañcukas are described as contractions rather than additions — nothing is given, capacity is narrowed.
Source: Tantrāloka; Pratyabhijñāhṛdaya; Svacchanda Tantra
The fourth cloak. Kāla imposes succession — a before, an after, and a now that is not the other nows.
Time here is not a container things sit in but a contraction of the eternal present into sequence.
Source: Tantrāloka; Pratyabhijñāhṛdaya; Svacchanda Tantra
Tattva six. The power by which the unlimited appears as one limited person.
Trika’s māyā is a real power of Śiva, not an unreal appearance. It does something: it contracts. The word is shared with Advaita and the meaning is not — for Śaṅkara māyā is the beginningless appearance that has no independent reality; for Abhinavagupta it is a genuine śakti doing genuine work.
Source: Tantrāloka; Pratyabhijñāhṛdaya sūtras 4–9; contrast: Advaita’s māyā
The veil is where the unlimited becomes limited. Māyā and the five kañcukas — sheaths of agency, knowledge, desire, time and causality — are what turn an unbounded consciousness into somebody in particular, at a place, at a moment, wanting things.
The five kañcukas are kalā, which limits the power to act; vidyā, which limits knowing; rāga, which produces desire by making one incomplete; kāla, which imposes time; and niyati, which imposes causal order and place. They are described as contractions rather than additions — each one is a capacity narrowed, not a faculty gained. Together with māyā they sit between the pure tattvas and puruṣa in the Trika scheme.
Source: Trika (kañcukas); Advaita (māyā as anirvacanīya); Sāṃkhya Kārikā (no māyā)
The fifth cloak. Niyati imposes causal order and place: this cause, this location, not any other.
With niyati the contraction is complete. What was unlimited is now a someone, somewhere, at some time, able to do a little and know a little, and wanting.
Source: Tantrāloka; Pratyabhijñāhṛdaya; Svacchanda Tantra
The pure tattvas are the five that Kashmir Śaivism places above the veil — Śiva, Śakti, Sadāśiva, Īśvara and Śuddhavidyā. They describe consciousness before it has limited itself, in stages that are not yet a world but are already a movement.
These five are the top of Trika's thirty-six. Śiva is pure awareness, Śakti its power to act, and the three below them describe the emergence of a distinction between I and this — Sadāśiva weighted toward the I, Īśvara toward the this, Śuddhavidyā holding them in balance. Nothing has yet been veiled; the difference is one of emphasis inside a single consciousness.
Source: Trika 36-tattva scheme; Sāṃkhya Kārikā (25 tattvas)
The third cloak. Rāga produces desire by producing incompleteness.
The order matters: the lack comes first and the wanting follows. Desire is not a flaw added to a complete being; it is what being incomplete feels like from inside.
Source: Tantrāloka; Pratyabhijñāhṛdaya; comparative: Ṛg Veda 10.129.4
The second cloak. Vidyā limits knowing: from omniscience to a viewpoint.
Not ignorance — a standpoint. Knowledge from somewhere rather than from nowhere.
Source: Tantrāloka; Pratyabhijñāhṛdaya; Svacchanda Tantra
Air is movement — the element of motion, dryness and touch. It is what carries things from one place to another, and in the body it is read as everything that travels rather than everything that is gaseous.
Vāyu emerges second and carries two qualities, sound and touch, since each element accumulates the tanmātras of those before it. It is paired with touch among the senses and the hand among the organs of action, and it is the elemental basis of vāta, the doṣa of movement, and of prāṇa in its various divisions.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā; Caraka Saṃhitā (vāta); Taittirīya Upaniṣad II and Haṭhayogapradīpikā (vāyus)
Earth is the last and densest element — solidity, smell, and the property of staying where it is put. It is the only element available to all five senses, because it carries every quality that came before it.
Pṛthvī emerges fifth and carries all five qualities: sound, touch, form, taste and smell. It is paired with smell among the senses and with generation among the organs of action, and it is the elemental basis of kapha's stability, of the structural tissues, and of mūlādhāra at the base of the subtle spine. Tamas predominates in it, which is why it persists.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā (accumulation, tamas); Bhagavad Gītā Ch. 14; Trika (contraction)
Ether is space as a medium rather than as emptiness — the first and subtlest element, the one that carries sound and makes room for everything after it. Nothing can be located until there is somewhere to be located in.
Ākāśa emerges first, from the tanmātra of sound, and carries that single quality alone. It is paired with hearing among the senses and with speech among the organs of action, and in the subtle body it is assigned to the throat centre. Its lightness is why it stands nearest the subtle end of the descent and furthest from earth.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā; Vaiśeṣika Sūtra (ākāśa as eternal substance)
Fire is transformation — heat, light and the capacity to turn one thing into another. It is the element of sight, because seeing requires light, and it is the busiest hub on this map: more threads pass through fire than through any other node.
Agni emerges third and carries three qualities: sound, touch and form. It is paired with sight and with the foot among the organs of action. Downstream it is the elemental basis of pitta, of jāṭharāgni and the tissue-fires in Āyurveda, of maṇipūra in the subtle body, and of the Sun in Jyotiṣa's elemental scheme.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā; Caraka Saṃhitā (agni); Haṭhayogapradīpikā; BPHS (elemental classification)
Water is cohesion — the element of flow, taste and the tendency of things to hold together rather than scatter. Where fire separates, water binds, and the tradition reads those as a pair rather than as opposites.
Jala emerges fourth and carries four qualities, adding taste. It is paired with taste among the senses and with excretion among the organs of action. It is the elemental basis of kapha in combination with earth, of rasa and the fluid tissues, and of svādhiṣṭhāna in the subtle body.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā; Caraka Saṃhitā (doṣa composition)
The jñānendriyas are the five capacities of knowing — hearing, touching, seeing, tasting, smelling. They face outward, and in the geometry of this map they are half of the membrane: the side through which the world is looked at.
Each is paired with an element and with a tanmātra: hearing with ether and sound, touch with air, sight with fire and form, taste with water, smell with earth. They arise from ahaṃkāra under sattva together with the organs of action and manas, which places all eleven faculties at one level of the descent rather than in a hierarchy.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā (indriya as subtle power, not organ)
The karmendriyas are the five capacities of action — speaking, grasping, moving, excreting, generating. They face the other way from the senses of knowing, and are the half of the membrane through which a person acts back upon what they have taken in.
Like the jñānendriyas they arise from ahaṃkāra under sattva, and each is likewise paired with an element: speech with ether, the hand with air, the foot with fire, excretion with water, generation with earth. The pairing is functional rather than anatomical — the point is which element's quality the action expresses.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā (karmendriyas and their elemental pairings)
The tanmātras are the five subtle essences — sound, touch, form, taste, smell — considered as what perception is of, before there is anything gross to perceive. The name means 'only that', which is close to being a definition: the quality alone, without a thing carrying it.
The tanmātras arise from ahaṃkāra under tamas, and from them the five gross elements are produced in sequence, each element carrying its own tanmātra plus all those preceding it. Ether has sound alone; air has sound and touch; fire adds form; water adds taste; earth, last and densest, carries all five. That accumulation is why earth is the only element available to every sense.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā (tanmātra→mahābhūta, accumulation); Vedānta (panchīkaraṇa)
Ahaṃkāra is the I-maker — the function that takes what buddhi has determined and adds the claim that it is mine. It is not the self but the manufacture of a self, running continuously and mostly unnoticed.
Ahaṃkāra is the second evolute, arising from buddhi, and it is the branch point of the entire descent. Under sattva it produces the eleven faculties — the five senses of knowing, the five of action, and manas. Under tamas it produces the five tanmātras and through them the elements. Rajas supplies the energy for both without producing anything itself. Everything below this node arrives by one of those two routes.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā (threefold antaḥkaraṇa); Taittirīya Upaniṣad II; later Vedānta (fourfold with citta)
Buddhi is the faculty that determines — that resolves what something is and decides. It is the first thing to emerge from prakṛti, and everything below it in the descent is downstream of a decision-making capacity rather than the other way round.
Buddhi is also called mahat, the great one, and the two names mark a genuine double aspect: mahat is the cosmic first evolute, buddhi the same tattva as it functions in an individual. Sattva predominates in it, which is why it discriminates. It is the faculty nearest puruṣa, and in Sāṃkhya's account liberation happens here — buddhi finally distinguishes itself from the witness it has been reflecting.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā (mahat/buddhi); Taittirīya Upaniṣad II (mahat as foundation)
Manas is the mind in its coordinating function — the faculty that receives from the senses, holds impressions together and passes them upward. It is not the thinker so much as the switchboard, and the tradition is careful not to confuse the two.
Manas is the eleventh faculty, arising from ahaṃkāra under sattva alongside the ten indriyas, and Sāṃkhya classes it as an indriya itself — an internal one. It faces both ways, taking in from the senses of knowing and directing the senses of action, which is precisely why it sits at the hinge of this map rather than on either side of it.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā (manas as eleventh indriya); Vedānta (antaḥkaraṇa); Nyāya (manas as aṇu)
The bindu is the point at the centre — Śiva and Śakti undivided, before there is anything to divide. It is drawn as the innermost thing on this map and also, if the recursion holds, as the outermost. It is where the mirror stops returning an image.
Bindu is a Tantric and Śaiva term, not a Sāṃkhya one, and its home is the Śrīcakra, where it sits at the centre of the ninth and last enclosure. In the haṭha corpus the same word does entirely different work: the Amṛtasiddhi holds bindu to be a substance to be retained and driven upward, with no cosmological sense at all. One syllable, two traditions, two objects.
Source: Śrīcakra / Śaiva bindu; Amṛtasiddhi (bindu as substance); Sāṃkhya Kārikā (no bindu)
Puruṣa is the witness — consciousness that observes and does nothing else. It does not act, does not change and is not affected by what it sees. In the whole scheme it is the one thing that is never an object, which is exactly why it is so difficult to say anything about.
Sāṃkhya establishes puruṣa by argument rather than assertion: prakṛti is unconscious and its evolutes are arrangements of unconscious material, so something must be present for which the arrangement is *for*. Puruṣa is that. Liberation is kaivalya — isolation — the recognition that the witness was never entangled in the first place, so nothing has to be undone.
Source: Sāṃkhya Kārikā (plurality of puruṣas); Advaita (ātman = brahman); Trika (Śiva as agent)
The map · The 42 · What this is · Sources · Your chart